Skip to content

A new Traditional Chinese version of the README.md for run_on_remote.py - #35585

Closed
GNG1130 wants to merge 1 commit into
huggingface:mainfrom
GNG1130:update-readme
Closed

GNG1130 wants to merge 1 commit into
huggingface:mainfrom
GNG1130:update-readme

Conversation

@GNG1130

@GNG1130 GNG1130 commented Jan 9, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

…e.py

What does this PR do?

This PR adds a new Traditional Chinese version of the README file, named README_zh_hant.md, to the project. The file provides clear instructions on how to run the run_on_remote.py script, including examples and additional context for developers who prefer to work with Traditional Chinese documentation.

Fixes # (issue)

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline,
    Pull Request section?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
    to it if that's the case.
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
    documentation guidelines, and
    here are tips on formatting docstrings.
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

@GNG1130
GNG1130 requested a review from stevhliu as a code owner January 9, 2025 13:44
@Rocketknight1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @stevhliu

@stevhliu stevhliu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool thanks!

Can you find another Chinese reader to review your translation please? I can't read it unfortunately 😅

@ArthurZucker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thank you for the translation! The script this README documents, examples/run_on_remote.py, was removed from the repository in #49357, so there's nothing left for this page to describe. Closing this PR, and thanks again for contributing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants